Imagine that you are a mountaineer. Nothing excites you more than testing your skill, strength and endurance against some of the most extreme environments on the planet, and now you've decided to take on the biggest challenge of all: Everest, the world's tallest mountain. You will be training for at least a year, slowly building up your endurance. Climbing Everest involves walking many hours a day, every day, for several weeks. How do you prepare for that?
The answer, as in many situations, lies in mathematics. Climbers maximize their training by measuring their heart rate. When they train, their goal is to reach a heart rate between 60 and 80 percent of their maximum. More than that, they risk burnout. A heart rate below 60 percent means the workout is too easy—they have to try harder. By combining this strategy with other types of training, overall fitness will increase over time and eventually climbers will be ready, in theory, for Everest.
Significant real-world problems
This type of scenario (linking the drama of mountaineering with work on percentages in high school math) can be used effectively in a problem-based learning (PBL) approach in the classroom. You may have heard a lot about ABP in recent years. It is an instructional approach where students learn by actively engaging in meaningful real-world problems. Instead of traditional direct instruction, PBL in mathematics encourages students to explore, discuss, and understand mathematical concepts by collaboratively solving problems. He Encourages critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and a deeper understanding of mathematical principles. positioning students as active learners rather than passive recipients of information.
Knowledge through experience
The influence of constructivist theories has been fundamental in the configuration of PBL, since Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development, which maintains that Knowledge is built through experiences and interactions.to the work of Leslie P. Steffe in The importance of students constructing their own mathematical understanding rather than passively receiving information..
You don't become an expert mountaineer simply by reading or watching others climb. You become proficient at climbing mountains, climbing, facing challenges, and getting back up when you stumble. And that's how people learn mathematics.
The traditional approach
Problem-based learning has a rich history in American education, with John Dewey laying the theoretical foundations in 1916 and McMaster University pioneered the PBL program for medical education in 1969. More recently, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics published Principles and standards for school mathematics in 2000, establishing a vision that emphasized problem solving, reasoning and communication, closely aligning with the principles of PBL. He encouraged teachers to design learning experiences that engaged students in meaningful mathematical thinking and problem solving.
However, PBL as a pedagogy has seen varying levels of adoption in mathematics classrooms across the United States, and many mathematics teachers have turned to Traditional teachings of formulas and procedures.. In 1998, a critical investigation examining data from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) revealed Teaching methods varied significantly across cultures.which results in a “teaching gap.†According to video documentation of the study, mathematics teaching in the United States focused predominantly on procedural skills, where students spent most of their time acquiring isolated skills through repetition. In contrast, Japanese teaching focused considerably more on deeper understanding, where students became more involved in collaboratively solving challenging problems.
Not “Math People”
The procedural approach can be effective for students who thrive in structured environments and excel at memorizing formulas and algorithms. However, for many students, this approach leads to a feeling of disconnection and a belief that they are not “mathematical people,” a negative self-perception related to math anxiety. Math anxiety can increase cognitive load, which is the mental effort required to process information. When students are anxious about mathematics, their Working memory resources may be diverted to managing anxiety instead of focusing on solving math problems.Resulting in Decreased performance on procedural tasks..
So what makes ABP different? The key to making it work is to introduce the right level of problem. Remember Vygotsky's zone of proximal development? It is essentially the space where learning and development occur most effectively – where the task is not so easy that it is boring, but not so difficult that it is discouraging. As with a mountaineer in training, that area where the level of challenge is appropriate is where commitment really occurs.
I have seen PBL build the confidence of students who thought they were not math experts. It makes them feel capable and that their knowledge is valuable. They develop the most creative strategies; The children have said things that leave me speechless. Suddenly, they're math people.
Support teachers with implementation
Why aren't more math teachers adopting problem-based learning in their classes? One of the main obstacles is the lack of training of teachers in PBL methods. Effective implementation of PBL requires a shift in the teacher's role from knowledge provider to learning facilitator.
In my experience presenting the problem-based curriculum Imagine instant messaging For teachers, professional learning is key to helping them achieve that change. Experiencing PBL first-hand allows teachers to develop a deeper conceptual understanding of mathematics while building confidence in their own teaching practices. Teachers are not only mastering content knowledge, but also shifting their mindset toward a more exploratory and inquiry-based approach. I see the same reactions from teachers as I do from students, the same joy at being creative with math: “Hey, I did it! I discovered! And then after that, and this is what we do in Imagine learning — Ongoing support and training is helpful.
Skills and understanding
Despite the challenges, the trend towards PBL in mathematics education has been growing, driven by evidence of its benefits in developing critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts, as well as building more positive mathematical identities. The incorporation of PBL aligns well with the broader contemporary shift toward more student-centered, interactive and meaningful learning experiences. It has become an increasingly important component of effective mathematics education, equipping students with the skills and understanding necessary to succeed in the 21st century.