Key issues associated with classification accuracy

Precision can be misleading if the data set contains rankings that are unequal. For example, a model that simply predicts the majority class will be 99% accurate if the dominant class understands 99% of the data. Unfortunately, you will not be able to properly classify the minority class. Other metrics such as accuracy, recall, and F1 score should be used to address this issue.

The 5 most common techniques that can be used to address the unbalanced class problem in the classification precision are:

Unbalanced class | knowledge engineering

1. Minority class oversampling: In this technique, we duplicate the samples in the minority class to even out the distribution of classes.
2. Majority class downsampling: In this technique we remove examples from the majority class to balance the distribution of classes.
3. Synthetic data generation: A technique used to generate new samples of the minority class. When random noise is introduced into existing examples or by generating new examples through interpolation or extrapolation, the generation of synthetic data occurs.
4. Anomaly detection: The minority class is treated as an anomaly in this technique, while the majority class is treated as normal data.
5. Changing the decision threshold: This technique adjusts the decision threshold of the classifier to increase sensitivity to the minority class.

When a model is overtrained on the training data and underperforms on the test data, it is said to be overfitting. As a result, the accuracy may be high on the training set but poor on the test set. Techniques like cross validation and regularization should be applied to resolve this issue.

Retrofit | freepik

There are several techniques that can be used to address overfitting.

1. Train the model with more data: This allows the algorithm to better detect the signal and minimize errors.
2. Regularization: This involves adding a penalty term to the cost function during training, which helps to constrain the complexity of the model and reduce overfitting.
3. Cross-validation: This technique helps to evaluate the performance of the model by dividing the data into training and validation sets, and then training and evaluating the model on each set.
4. set methods. This is a technique that involves training multiple models and then combining their predictions, which helps reduce model variance and bias.

The model will produce biased predictions if the training data set is biased. This can result in high accuracy on the training data, but performance on untrained data may be lower. Techniques such as data augmentation and resampling must be used to address this problem. Some other ways to tackle this problem are listed below:

Data bias | Explorium

1. One technique is to ensure that the data used is representative of the population that is intended to be modeled. This can be done by random sampling of data from the population or by using techniques such as oversampling or undersampling to balance the data.
2. Test and evaluate models carefully by measuring accuracy levels for different demographic categories and sensitive groups. This can help identify any biases in the data and model and address them.
3. Be aware of observer bias, which occurs when you impose your opinions or wishes on the data, either knowingly or accidentally. This can be done by being aware of the potential for bias and taking steps to minimize it.
4. Use preprocessing techniques to remove or correct for data bias. For example, using techniques like data cleaning, data normalization, and data scaling.

Image by author

The performance of a classification algorithm is described using a confusion matrix. It is a table layout where the actual values ​​are checked against the anticipated values ​​in the matrix to define the performance of a sorting algorithm. Some ways to address this problem are:

1. Analyze the values ​​in the matrix and identify any patterns or trends in the errors. For example, if there are a lot of false negatives, it could indicate that the model is not sensitive enough to certain classes.
2. Use metrics such as precision, recall, and F1 score to assess model performance. These metrics provide a more detailed understanding of the model’s performance and can help identify specific areas where the model is having problems.
3. Adjust the threshold of the model, if the threshold is too high or too low this can cause the model to produce more false positives or false negatives.
4. Use ensemble methods, such as bagging and boosting, which can help improve model performance by combining predictions from multiple models.

Learn more about the confusion matrix in this video

In conclusion, classification accuracy is a useful metric for evaluating the performance of a machine learning model, but it can be misleading. To gain a more complete picture of the model’s performance, additional metrics including precision, recall, F1 score, and confusion matrix should also be used. To overcome problems such as unbalanced classes, overfitting, and data bias, techniques including cross-validation, normalization, data augmentation, and resampling must be applied.

Ayesha Saleem Possess a passion for renewing brands with meaningful content writing, copywriting, email marketing, SEO writing, social media marketing, and creative writing.