Gemini vs ChatGPT: Which is better for coding?

Introduction

Do you feel lost in the world of code? Don't worry, you're not alone! ai assistants like Gemini and ChatGPT are here to help. But with two strong options, how do you choose? This guide will compare ChatGPT to Gemini in terms of code. We'll see which one explains things better, helps you write cleaner code, and tackles those tricky programming problems. Get ready to find your perfect ai coding partner!

ChatGPT vs. Gemini: Overview

<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-why-use-ai-chatbots-for-code-generation”>Why use ai chatbots for code generation?

There are several compelling reasons to use ai chatbots for code generation:

• ai chatbots can automate repetitive coding tasks, such as writing boilerplate code, generating basic functions, and suggesting code snippets. This will allow you to focus on the more creative and strategic aspects of coding.
• They can analyze existing code and suggest improvements, helping you catch bugs and write cleaner, more efficient code.
• Feel trapped? ai chatbots can offer suggestions and complete partial code, helping you overcome obstacles and maintain coding momentum.
• They can explain complex programming concepts and suggest alternative approaches, accelerating your learning curve and expanding your coding skills.
• The best ai chatbots constantly learn and adapt to new libraries and coding trends. This can help you stay up to date with the latest developments in your chosen programming language.
• Some ai chatbots can understand and generate code in multiple languages, which can be a big advantage if you work on international projects.

Also read: 12 ai tools that can generate code to help programmers

Let's look at some examples to compare chatGPT with Gemini for coding!

Gemini vs ChatGPT: developing a website

This section compares Gemini and ChatGPT, two powerful ai assistants for coders. We analyze your strengths in understanding code, generating different parts of a website, and explaining complex concepts.

Immediate:

Basic HTML code for a word count website.

ChatGPT

Production:

Gemini

Production:

Final result of Gemini vs ChatGPT to develop a website

The code generated by ChatGPT gave a better result.

ChatGPT vs Gemini to generate Python code

Immediate:

Write a fully documented Python code to load and read the breast cancer dataset from the sklearn library, and then give me some insights from the data along with visualizations, and then use multiple algorithms and choose the machine learning model to use in the data set and also provide the results for the model.

ChatGPT

# Import necessary libraries
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
from sklearn.datasets import load_breast_cancer
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split, cross_val_score
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score, classification_report
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.svm import SVC
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.neighbors import KNeighborsClassifier
from sklearn.model_selection import GridSearchCV

# Load the breast cancer dataset
data = load_breast_cancer()

# Extract features and target
x = data.data
y = data.target

# Create a DataFrame for better visualization
df = pd.DataFrame(data=np.c_(x, y), columns=np.append(data.feature_names, ('target')))
df('target') = df('target').astype(int)

# Split the data into training and testing sets
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(x, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)

# Standardize features
scaler = StandardScaler()
X_train_scaled = scaler.fit_transform(X_train)
X_test_scaled = scaler.transform(X_test)

# Insights and Visualizations
# 1. Distribution of target classes
plt.figure(figsize=(6, 4))
sns.countplot(data=df, x='target')
plt.title('Distribution of Target Classes')
plt.xlabel('Target')
plt.ylabel('Count')
plt.show()

# 2. Correlation between features
plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
sns.heatmap(df.corr(), annot=True, cmap='coolwarm', fmt=".2f")
plt.title('Correlation Heatmap')
plt.show()

# 3. Pairplot of a few important features
plt.figure(figsize=(12, 8))
sns.pairplot(df(('mean radius', 'mean texture', 'mean perimeter', 'mean area', 'target')), hue="target", diag_kind='kde')
plt.show()

# Choose the best suitable machine learning model
# Models to be evaluated: Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors
models = {
    "Logistic Regression": LogisticRegression(max_iter=10000),
    "Support Vector Machine": SVC(kernel="linear"),
    "Random Forest": RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100),
    "K-Nearest Neighbors": KNeighborsClassifier()
}

# Evaluate models using cross-validation
results = {}
for name, model in models.items():
    scores = cross_val_score(model, X_train_scaled, y_train, cv=5)
    results(name) = scores.mean()

# Print cross-validation results
print("Cross-validation results:")
for name, score in results.items():
    print(f"{name}: {score:.4f}")

# Select the best model
best_model_name = max(results, key=results.get)
best_model = models(best_model_name)
print("\nBest model:", best_model_name)

# Train and evaluate the best model
best_model.fit(X_train_scaled, y_train)
y_pred_train = best_model.predict(X_train_scaled)
y_pred_test = best_model.predict(X_test_scaled)

train_accuracy = accuracy_score(y_train, y_pred_train)
test_accuracy = accuracy_score(y_test, y_pred_test)

print("\nTraining Accuracy:", train_accuracy)
print("Testing Accuracy:", test_accuracy)
print("\nClassification Report:")
print(classification_report(y_test, y_pred_test))

Production:

These are the insights provided by the code generated by ChatGPT:

Most suitable machine learning model:

Gemini

import pandas as pd
from sklearn.datasets import load_breast_cancer
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.svm import SVC
from sklearn.neighbors import KNeighborsClassifier
from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeClassifier
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score, classification_report

# Load the breast cancer dataset
data = load_breast_cancer()

# Convert data and target to pandas dataframe
df = pd.DataFrame(data.data, columns=data.feature_names)
df('target') = data.target

print(df.info())

# Check distribution of target variable (malignant or benign)
df('target').value_counts().plot(kind='bar')

# Explore features with boxplots (consider features you might find interesting)
df.plot(kind='box', subplots=True, figsize=(12, 12))

# Split data into training and testing sets
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(df.drop('target', axis=1), df('target'), test_size=0.2)

# Define and train multiple machine learning models
models = ()
models.append(('Logistic Regression', LogisticRegression()))
models.append(('SVC', SVC()))
models.append(('KNN', KNeighborsClassifier()))
models.append(('Decision Tree', DecisionTreeClassifier()))
models.append(('Random Forest', RandomForestClassifier()))

# Evaluate each model and print results
for name, model in models:
    model.fit(X_train, y_train)
    y_pred = model.predict(X_test)
    print(f"\n--- {name} Results ---")
    print(f"Accuracy: {accuracy_score(y_test, y_pred)}")
    print(classification_report(y_test, y_pred))

# Choose the best performing model based on your evaluation criteria (e.g., accuracy)
best_model_name, best_model = models(0)  # Modify this to choose the best model

# Train the chosen model on the entire training data
best_model.fit(X_train, y_train)

# Use the best model to predict on unseen data (X_test)
y_pred = best_model.predict(X_test)

# Print final evaluation results for the best model
print(f"\n--- Final Results ({best_model_name}) ---")
print(f"Accuracy: {accuracy_score(y_test, y_pred)}")
print(classification_report(y_test, y_pred))

Production:

Information provided by the Gemini code:

Most suitable ML model:

Gemini vs ChatGPT for encoding: which is better?

The effectiveness of the result depends on the purpose and objective:

ChatGPT code focuses more on feature preprocessing, model exploration and selection:

• It scales features, which can be crucial for many machine learning algorithms, particularly distance-based ones like SVM or KNN.
• Provides visualizations to better understand your data, such as distribution plots, correlation heat maps, and pair plots.
• Evaluates cross-validated models, providing a more robust estimate of model performance.
• Select the best model based on cross-validation scores.

Gemini code focuses more on evaluating multiple models quickly and choosing the best performing one based on accuracy:

• It does not scale features, which could lead to suboptimal performance on certain models.
• Directly compare multiple models and select the best one based on the accuracy of the test set.
• It provides quick evaluation of models without much emphasis on feature exploration.

If you are interested in a detailed understanding of data and model performance and have computational resources to support cross-validation, the ChatGPT code would be better. On the other hand, if you want to get a quick overview of the performance of different models and prioritize model accuracy, Gemini might be more suitable.

Conclusion

In both examples, we witnessed ChatGPT and Gemini outperform each other based on the specific use case and message provided. As a coder or data science professional, it is essential to clearly understand your goals and use these tools to support you in establishing a foundation for your project. However, it is undeniable that a certain level of human intervention is necessary in both scenarios.

What are your thoughts? Feel free to share them in the comments below!

For more such informative content, keep following us at Analytics Vidhya Blogs.

Frequent questions