I asked ChatgPP to appoint 5 actions from the United Kingdom for a perfectly balanced ISA, this is what he chose!

Time is being exhausted to load the actions and actions of this year Isa Subidance and I am accelerating my search for the main actions of the United Kingdom. So I decided to cut corners asking for help from Chatgpt. I told him that I wanted to create the perfectly balanced portfolio of only five Ftse 100 stocks.

Chatgpt is not a stockpicker. He has no ideas of his own. It simply absorbs things on the web and regurgite. So I had to feed careful criteria. Then I requested a balance between growth and income, and infraval impulse and impulse impulse, in different sectors. I myself did most of Lano's work. That is in that should be.

<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-ai-really-rates-astrazeneca”>ai really qualifies Astrazeneca

His main selection was the pharmaceutical giant Astrazeneca (LSE: AZN). Which turns out to be the largest stock in FTSE 100. An absolute beginner could have chosen that.

My 'Bro Bro' said that few companies combine a defensive resilience with a growth potential like this, since “His global presence and his drug strength make him a long -term winner.”

He warned that Astrazeneca's assessment is not cheap, with a price ratio (P/E) of just under 20 years. Personally, I would also have warned that the high expectations of investors mean whether their drug channel slows down, or Donald Trump attacks Big Pharma, the shares could receive a blow.

The next chatgpt selection was the insurer Legal and General Groupwhat calls “A long -term game in the town of the United Kingdom aging”. His actions rarely go anywhere, but the performance of 8.9% certainly dazzles.

As I own the actions, I cannot argue with this choice. But ChatgPT was wrong terribly, claiming that he trades the profits seven times when in reality they are 82.8 times. That follows a recent profit receipt that Chatgpt somehow was lost. As chatgpt admits, you can make mistakes. Absolutely.

I also own your next selection, Consumer Goods Group Uneilever. Again, I had objections. Yes, Unilever has powerful global brands, such as Pigeon, Parsley and Magnumand if, “It offers constant income and resilience, even during recessions.”

But Chatgpt did not mention that the Board has lost the way in recent years, forcing it to replace the CEO Hein Schumacher after only 19 months. Nor did he mention the threat of tariffs.

I qualify all these ftse 100 actions

I don't have Red RiverChatgpt's choice of the mining sector, but would like to have done so. It seems a brilliant value with a p/e of only nine, while producing 6.6%.

Like all basic products actions, it has been affected by Chinese problems and the broader global deceleration, with the profits of 2024 per year 2024 below the estimates. Chatgpt did not stand out either, he only stayed with generalities. At least he obtained the right P/E this time. I still think it is worth considering Rio Tinto with a long -term vision.

Finally, Chatgpt served an adequate growth stock, and a good one, through the information and analysis company Rex. He said it is “In silence, one of the FTSE actions of 100 best yields in recent years, thanks to its subscription -based business model”.

Rex is expensive, with a P/E of more than 30 years, but now it could be a good time to consider it with low shares by 10% in the last month. That is me saying that, by the way. Chatgpt never mentioned it. It is very fun to play with chatbot, but I will never treat it as a serious investment tool.