ADVERTISEMENT

The NFT trademark lawsuit between luxury brand Hermès International SA and artist Mason Rothschild over the MetaBirkin NFT project has been settled. This sets an important precedent for legal cases in the Web3 world. The ruling, which came after six days of proceedings in a Manhattan court, found that Rothschild’s sale of bag-inspired NFTs violated Hermès’ rights to the “Birkin” trademark. Therefore, the jury awarded Hermès $133,000 in damages. Furthermore, the lawsuit determined that Rothschild NFTs are not protected by the First Amendment.

metabirkins NFT image at center of nft trademark lawsuit

Some of the MetaBirkin NFTs at the Center of the Trademark Lawsuit

Hermès vs MetaBirkin NFT trademark lawsuit sets precedent at Web3 World

This case highlights the need for regulation in the crypto and NFT space. It also serves as a warning to NFT creators that intellectual property law can be enforced on the blockchain. Hermès sued Rothschild in January 2022 for trademark infringement over the launch of the MetaBirkins. To clarify, MetaBirkins is a collection of 100 NFT wallets. These purses have a strong resemblance to Hermès Birkin bags. Therefore, following the release of the MetaBirkins, Hermès International sued Rothschild for trademark infringement.

The jury sided with Hermès, finding that Rothschild had infringed on the trademark and that NFTs should be subject to trademark laws.

What happens next?

The outcome of this case has implications for NFT creators in the Web3 world. For a long time, the creators of NFTs have operated under the assumption that the decentralized nature of the blockchain and First Amendment protections would keep them out of legal trouble. However, this judgment suggests that creators should consider Intellectual Property Law by founding NFT collections. This is especially important for those creations that are derivatives of or similar to notable brands.

In conclusion, the NFT trademark lawsuit has set an important precedent for legal cases in the Web3 world. Firstly, it highlights the need for regulation in the crypto and NFT space. Furthermore, this serves as a warning to NFT creators that intellectual property law can be enforced on the blockchain. As more brands enter the NFT market, it is important for creators to consider the potential for trademark infringement before launching derivative or knockoff NFT collections.

..


All investment/financial opinions expressed by NFTevening.com are not recommendations.

This article is educational material.

As always, do your own research before making any type of investment.

Next Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended.

ADVERTISEMENT
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 96,520.86
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 3,338.35
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 658.36
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 182.84
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 2.22
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.890218
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.314123
shiba-inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB) $ 0.000021
avalanche-2
Avalanche (AVAX) $ 37.42
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 6.96
matic-network
Polygon (MATIC) $ 0.473497
litecoin
Litecoin (LTC) $ 99.32
optimism
Optimism (OP) $ 1.74
crypto-com-chain
Cronos (CRO) $ 0.155907
kaspa
Kaspa (KAS) $ 0.116634
injective-protocol
Injective (INJ) $ 20.51
pepe
Pepe (PEPE) $ 0.000017
bonk
Bonk (BONK) $ 0.000031
jasmycoin
JasmyCoin (JASMY) $ 0.032565

Get daily news updates to your inbox!

Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates!