<img src="https://crypto.news/app/uploads/2023/10/crypto-news-nft-sales-surge-after-SEC-fails03.webp” />
The world of cryptocurrencies is at a crossroads. Find out why tech leaders think the SEC could be on the wrong track.
The world of finance is changing rapidly, especially with the rise of cryptocurrencies. The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is in charge of making sure everything runs smoothly and fairly for everyone. But as new technologies like cryptocurrencies become popular, some big names in the business world think the SEC isn’t handling things all that well.
Let’s dive into what they have to say about the SEC’s approach.
Musk, Cuban and the SEC
As the ongoing debate continues over what constitutes “fair play” in the financial world, Elon Musk and Mark Cuban emerge as two defiant figures defying the conventions established by the SEC.
Elon Musk
Known for his companies such as Tesla, SpaceX and his recent name change from Twitter to X, Musk is frequently at odds with regulators, including the SEC.
His history with the agency is notable, especially the 2018 incident where both he and Tesla faced a $20 million fined due to a tweet that the SEC deemed misleading. He went as far as technology/musk-says-us-sec-bastards-forced-settlement-over-tesla-tweets-2022-04-14/#:~:text=Tesla%20CEO%20Elon%20Musk%20leaves,April%204%2C%202019″ target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>Referrer to the SEC as “bastards,” especially after a settlement over his tweets about Tesla.
Now, Musk’s frustrations have grown over time, not just with the SEC but with regulatory frameworks in general.
He recently tweeted that our civilization is gradually being stifled by excessive regulations and strongly advocates for comprehensive deregulation.
Cuban brand
The billionaire crypto investor’s interactions with the SEC are underlined by his strong words, labeling the organization as “useless” and an entity filing “ridiculous” lawsuits.
These comments arise from his brush with insider trading. charges which were later rejected. Cuban also highlights the SEC’s ambiguous stance on cryptocurrency regulations, pointing out its inconsistent guidelines.
What is happening now?
But it’s not just the fiery comments that define his fight with the SEC. Both Musk and Cuban, along with other interested parties, have recently submitted a amicus curiae brief to the United States Supreme Court, pointing out the problematic nature of the SEC’s administrative procedures that exclude jurors.
Their shared belief is that this approach infringes on the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial, especially highlighted in the context of SEC v. Jarkesy. This collective effort by the amici curiae sheds light on a notable change in the SEC’s methods.
Between 2013 and 2014, the SEC began preferring its internal processes to federal courts, especially after some failed insider trading cases.
While Musk is currently caught in another legal tangle with the SEC, both he and Cuban, backed by amici curiae, are standing firm. They argue that bypassing federal court juries runs counter to the SEC’s own mission and could, in turn, endanger the investors and markets it promises to safeguard.
The Ripple Controversy
The SEC’s actions against Ripple and its native token, XRP, have sparked significant debates. At the center of this discourse are two pivotal figures: Brad Garlinghouse and Stuart Alderoty, who have consistently expressed their discontent with the SEC’s approach.
Brad Garlinghouse
As CEO of Ripple, Garlinghouse’s criticism of the SEC has been deep and personal. He didn’t hold back when he accused the SEC of trying to “smother crypto”during the lawsuit against Ripple Labs.
Additionally, Garlinghouse even recently mentioned the SEC’s dismissal of certain claims such as “impressive capitulation.”
Garlinghouse didn’t hesitate when he suggested that SEC Chairman Gary Gensler’s priorities seemed to lean more toward consolidating power than fostering an enabling economic environment in the United States.
Stuart Alderoty
Ripple general counsel Alderoty has echoed similar sentiments. He welcomed the dismissal of charges against Ripple executives as indicative of an “SEC surrender.”
This is not everything. Alderoty recently was explicit in his criticism of the SEC for its alleged delaying tactics in the case against Ripple. He has also expressed extreme dissatisfaction with the SEC Chairman’s comments on cryptocurrencies in a Congressional setting.
Brian Armstrong and the Coinbase saga
Brian Armstrong, head of Coinbase, one of the world’s leading cryptocurrency exchanges, has been embroiled in several regulatory disputes with the SEC over clearer regulations on cryptocurrencies and their supporting technologies.
A major flashpoint was the SEC’s lawsuit against Coinbase, accusing it of trading in crypto assets that should have been registered as securities.
Armstrong quickly questioned the SEC chairman’s stance, calling it “technology/coinbase-ceo-says-company-has-been-historically-transparent-with-sec-cnbc-2023-06-07/” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener”>isolated part”and underscoring Coinbase’s attempts to comply. Regulatory clarity remains Armstrong’s rallying cry. Fighting the SEC, he led crypto-dc-push-for-new-rules-warning-jobs-will-go-overseas-213140099.html” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener”>initiatives in Washington to resolve ambiguities in crypto regulations.
Additionally, Armstrong also stressed the need for a clear rulebook, especially in the face of actions like the SEC’s Wells Notice. He described such measures as counterproductive for the country.
His claim that the SEC had once advised Coinbase to trade only bitcoin (btc) further paints a picture of what he considers an overly restrictive regulatory approach.
On Twitter, Armstrong lamented the departure of American investors and business activities to more cryptocurrency-friendly jurisdictions, and questioned the rationale behind penalizing American companies for this change.
Tim Draper’s quest for regulatory clarity
Tim Draper, a venture capital bigwig with billions to his name, has not been reticent about his frustrations with the SEC’s methodology for policing the cryptocurrency world.
Draper’s open letter to the SEC regarding the categorization of DAO tokens as securities underscores its proactive involvement in shaping the discourse around crypto regulatory classifications.
Drawing parallels between the SEC’s tactics and those of Russia, Draper’s Twitter critique attacks the SEC’s “regulation by enforcement” doctrine. He calls for unambiguous regulatory frameworks, emphasizing a preference for proactive guidance rather than reactive litigation.
Meanwhile, in a recent interview, Draper also accused the SEC chairman of harming the US with anti-crypto policies, and called for a new form of regulation. He emphasized that the SEC’s current stance discourages innovation and creates a confusing regulatory climate for crypto companies.
Draper also mentioned that while crypto companies are open to clear guidelines, the lack of clarity and apparent arbitrariness in law enforcement actions drive innovation out of the country.
Jeremy Allaire’s troubled relationship with the SEC
Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire has been vocal about the SEC’s modus operandi in regulating cryptocurrencies. At the forefront of Allaire’s reservations is the SEC’s treatment of cryptocurrencies, which he believes has sown seeds of crypto-service-providers-may-not-be-complying-with-us-laws-202303231801#:~:text=USDC%20issuer%20Circle%E2%80%99s%20CEO%20Jeremy,in%20the%20crosshairs%20of%20the” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener”>palpable anxiety within the market.
Allaire’s assertive stance on payments stablecoins, like USDC, being pegged to the US dollar, highlights a gap. Allaire posits that such assets would be better managed under the watchful eye of banking regulators, pointing to a fundamental disagreement over regulatory jurisdiction.
To further underscore his concerns, Allaire has focused on the SEC’s regulatory efforts, particularly its pronounced focus on stablecoins. He perceives this emphasis as misplaced, suggesting that the SEC may be overlooking the forest for the trees in its regulatory pursuit.
The road ahead
The relationship between the SEC and the tech world will be crucial as cryptocurrencies gain broader adoption. Ensuring their safe and equitable use is a shared goal. Collaboration and communication between regulators and innovators are essential to keep the financial landscape in sync with changing trends and ensure fairness for all stakeholders.
