When the news broke Last year, when ai heavyweight OpenAI and Axel Springer reached a financial and partnership deal, it seemed to bode well for harmony between the people who write words and the tech companies that use them to help to create and train artificial intelligence models. At that time OpenAI had also reached a stalemate. according to the APfor reference.
Then, as the year ended, the New York Times sued OpenAI and its backer Microsoft, alleging that the ai company's generative ai models were “built by copying and using millions of copyrighted news articles, research in depth, opinion pieces, reviews, how-to guides and more.” Due to what the Times considers an “illegal use of (its) work to create artificial intelligence products,” OpenAI “may generate results that recite the Times content word for word, summarize it in detail and imitate its expressive style, as demonstrate dozens of examples”. .”
The Exchange explores new companies, markets and money.
Read it every morning on TechCrunch+ or get The Exchange newsletter every Saturday.
The Times added in its lawsuit that it “objected after discovering that defendants were using Times content without permission to develop their models and tools” and that “negotiations have not led to a resolution” with OpenAI.
How to balance the need to respect copyright and Ensuring that ai development does not stop will not have a quick answer. But the more contentious agreements and disputes between ai creators and companies that want to assimilate and use that work to build ai models create an unhappy time for both sides of the conflict. technology companies are busy preparing new generative ai models trained with data that include copyrighted material in their software products; It's worth noting that Microsoft is a leader in that particular job. And media companies that have spent a lot of time building a corpus of reported and otherwise created materials are outraged that their efforts are being subsumed by machines that give nothing back to the people who provided their training data.
